Album Review

Score 6.4
Written by Chris McDonald
Published on 11/21/2010
Going into this review, I realized I could analyze the long-awaited conclusion to Deathspell Omega’s trilogy in two ways; as some mystical statement of philosophical intent miraculously bestowed on the metal world through metaphysical entities disguised as musicians, or as a metal album. Both paths are suitable for the kind of art Deathspell Omega makes, but for the sake of my sanity and your attention span I’m going to review Paracletus for what most listeners should see it as, and that’s a metal album. And, as a metal album, its not very good, and I’m quite disappointed by it.
 
Deathspell Omega has been operating “ahead of the curve” since Si Monumentum Requires, Circumspice, a groundbreaking if overblown introduction to the band’s new modus operandi. While Si Monumentum was a strong release, the band really peaked with lengthy EP Kénôse, a brilliant middle-ground between the more digestible pacing of Si Monumentum and the manic progressive nature which they would soon pursue. After that, the band released Fas - Ite, Maledicti, in Ignem Aeternum and my infatuation waned, for in the interest of being as complex and impenetrable as possible, Deathspell Omega had ventured into something of a musical dead zone. Anyone who doesn’t completely have their head up their own ass knows there was about five to ten minutes of actual worthwhile music on that album, but because its Deathspell Omega, the legions of bewildered fans had to pretend to like it, or risk looking stupid in the eyes of the more intelligent, philosophical metalheads. In shrouding themselves with as much anonymity as possible and bumping up the philosophical mysterioso-factor of their music and image, the band has effectively shielded themselves from any criticism of their work. It’s the classic “get people to like your art by making them feel stupid if they don’t” motif.
 
My point with all of this is, Deathspell Omega have achieved such a high rank on the elitist food chain that actual discussion of their music has become secondary. People shrug off any crappy moments on their CDs as just a failure to “understand” their greater significance, or chalking it up to the band being “purposely” bad because they’re just that damn smart. Thing is, following the headache-inducing Fas and the convoluted Chaining the Katcheon EP, Deathspell Omega’s mask has slipped, and I now feel confident in my appraisal that Paracletus is simply a mediocre album, not some mind-shatteringly brilliant masterpiece that I’m “not getting.”
 
Ironically enough, Paracletus is disappointing for the exact opposite reason that Fas was. While the overly drum-heavy production and absurdly abstract arrangements rendered most of Fas’s intense moments a formless wall of noise, the vast majority of the music on Paracletus is readily accessible to the listener -- problem is, most of it is boring as hell. Much of the band’s blistering riffwork and drumming has been replaced with lots of mid-paced, limp-wristed progressive/jazz melodies that effectively strip the songs of the furious momentum and sinister energy this project was known for. These elements have been present in various forms since the band’s rebirth on Si Monumentum, but they almost take center stage on Paracletus, and while they’re far from unlistenable and even enjoyable at times, this is not what I turn to Deathspell Omega for. Without a more stable metallic core, this aspect of the band’s sound lacks the anchor that would otherwise make it effective at breaking up the pace. Instead, it feels like we get little snippets of blasting black metal filling in the gaps between the mid-tempo noodling.
 
This problem is exacerbated by the fact that this sudden love for wimpy melodic plucking has even snaked its way into the band’s “black metal” segments. Third track “Abscission” clashes thunderous blastbeats with dull, meandering strumming for a full six minutes with little in the way of dynamics or narrative flow, and the jumpy little riff at the beginning of “Have You Beheld the Fevers?” is surprisingly irritating. For fuck’s sake guys, you’re Deathspell Omega —TREMOLO PICK SOMETHING! This lack of significant musical substance is especially problematic considering Paracletus’s short length; at just over forty-two minutes, this LP is only a tad longer than the Kénôse EP, but it feels like there’s about a third as much worthwhile material as on that release. Almost half of the songs here seem more like interludes than full blown compositions, and it makes the album as a whole feel unsubstantial and generally unsatisfying.  
 
But what’s most disappointing, especially for fans that have been following the band’s progression over the last several years, is that Paracletus doesn’t take Deathspell Omega in any new directions; it doesn’t even seem to want to. There isn’t really anything explored on here that we haven’t heard before from the band, and the few new touches peppered in typically do more harm than good (namely, the horrible French spoken word segments). While Fas stumbled with its musical execution, few would argue that the album broke down barriers and took the idea of black metal in an entirely new direction that people never would have considered before. Paracletus feels more like a simplified version of Fas, and at this point its not enough for the band to reenact former glories, especially when the results are this uninteresting. We’ve all heard the techy black metal riffs, the free-form growling vocals, the spidery melodic touches; these things simply aren’t enough to carry the band by themselves anymore.
 
Paracletus isn’t a complete shitkick by any means—album centerpiece “Phosphene” is a pretty ripping track that dishes out some truly demented riffwork that harkens back to the Kénôse days, and “Devouring Famine” and “Apokatastasis Pantôn” close the album with a nice tandem of blackened madness and epic, dramatic tremolo figures. Truth is, this album is filled with neat little riffs and neat little bits, but for every awesome moment Paracletus delivers, it pads it with two that are either boring, wimpy, or simply incomprehensible. It’s a shame to see a once outstanding project close out its master trilogy in such ho-hum fashion, but I can’t honestly say I’m too surprised to see Deathspell Omega take a bath like this; its been obvious that the band’s musical aspirations have taken a backseat to their intellectual ones for several years now. Paracletus makes it frustratingly obvious that these elusive Frenchmen are still capable of making art both progressively minded and musically engaging, if only they’d allow themselves to do so. Hopefully future releases will see Deathspell Omega play more off of the strengths that made them legends to begin with.



DeathHead's Avatar
DeathHead | posted on 4/2012 | Reply
Well this one is downright accessible compared to Fas. I like it. The melodies in Epiklesis I, Epiklesis II and Phosphene are actually, dare I say... catchy. But there's still enough of the trademark DsO density to provide some replay value. I liked Fas, which was an extremely challenging listen, but I think I'll come back to this one more. I'm not a DsO elitist but I'd give this a higher score - maybe 8/10.
CannibalDave's Avatar
CannibalDave | posted on 11/2011 | Reply
I like this album quite a bit. The only other Deathspell Omega I have owned/heard prior to this was the Circumspice album, which I felt was good but not great. Suffice to say I had no expectations at all heading into this one. Well, it's obviously a bit different but I think it's pretty damn good. I'd hesitate to call it black metal - it's really more like some sort of dark, progressive metal.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 10/2011 | Reply
I strongly disagree. Paracletus, along with Fas, Kenose, and Si Monvmentvm are some of the greatest releases the metal scene has birthed for over 2 decades. I understand that musical taste is a subjective thing and hence any review merely reflects the reviewer's personal taste. But for me, DsO, along with Blut Aus Nord, simply are beyond any other band out there. Since discovering these 2 bands I haven't listened to anything else. Paracletus is just astounding. And, the only reason why it hasn't struck some as the monumental work it is is because DsO now has no one to compare to except themselves. Logically, I would not hesitate to say Paracletus is their greatest work so far. Emotionally, I would rank it behind Si Monvmentvm, but this is because when Si Monvmentvm came out there was nothing like it. But by now most of us are familiar with what was once an awe-inspiring paradigm shift in Black Metal and hence Paracletus doesn't quite have the impact of Si Monvmentvm. Still, to rate Paracletus as anything less than a 9 is a travesty. Listen to it again. And this time, do it at night and alone. Clear your mind and put on your headphone. This is not headbanging music. DsO requires your full attention. Then think about the fact that what you're listening to began with one guy and a guitar thinking all of it up. Enjoy.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 10/2011
By the way, I didn't sign my name. August Holderlin
ManicAeon's Avatar
ManicAeon | posted on 8/2011 | Reply
I enjoy this album thoroughly. It's really dark and demented sounding, in a way that other DsO albums don't seem to reach. The instrumentals are top notch, the vocals are wicked. I love it, it might even be my favorite album, it's super catchy as well, which is strange for DsO songs. Good review, to each their own!
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 1/2011 | Reply
Some well written points, but also some very arrogant statements. I thoroughly enjoy this album.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 1/2011 | Reply
You have to hand it to DsO - not many metal bands would have the vision and ambition to record a Spanish language tribute to the hick from The Simpsons.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 1/2011
holy shit, took me a sec but i got it and i laughed out loud!
dougwhatyoudidisrape's Avatar
dougwhatyoudidisrape | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
The greatest injustice ever perpetrated at MetalReview continues to go unfixed. Shameful
lordperrin's Avatar
lordperrin | posted on 12/2010
I still think this album is pretty shit.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 1/2011
Yes, but you're a massive faggot lordperrin.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
While I agree that "Phosphene" is the best song, you spend more time complaining about how the band progressed than actually making any relevant criticisms. Statements like the "head up the ass" comment are pointless, unless you're actually willing to explain why there are only 5-10 minutes of worthwhile music on the album. Besides that, you make assumptions about their motif that just make you sound extremely biased, and make this a pretty pathetic to read.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
So you didn't get the album? What a waste.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
I dont agree with thsi review whatsoever, its a class album as was Fas, obviously he doesnt know/understand what he's reviewing here
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
jesus, why do we allow anonymous posters again? frikkin ridiculous. but anyways, this album is insanely awesome, i don't know what other people are hearing. it may not have the overpowering atmosphere that their other albums have, but musically this shit is sick. easily the best progressive black metal album i've heard in a while
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Anyone who doesn’t completely have their head up their own ass knows there were about five to ten words of actual worthwhile critique in this review.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Anyone ignorant enough to think that this music has anything to do with jazz has no business reviewing it.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Its beyond me that you actually took so much time and space to write this pretentious garbage. I mean, even if you'd loved the album it would be plain stupid.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Well this review made me want to go take a listen to Fas, all I've heard was Kenose which I thought was alright. and Chaining the Katechon which I absolutely love.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
"Tremendous review, Chris. Although I disagree with the score, this is a top-notch piece of literary excellence and I agree with every word of it. Brilliant analysis of the band thus far" << Come on, have a word with yourself, that's just laughable sycophancy. I thought it was a poor, biased analysis of the band so far, too. The tremelo picking comment sums up the tone of this review - amateurish and uninformative.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 12/2010
Exactly my thoughts, but most laughable was the "intelligent, philosophical metalheads" comment. What does that have to do with anything, and how was that even necessary?
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
@Cantona: Spot on. I've been noticing that, too, and it's a poor reflection on this site and its reviewers. The irony of reviewers getting pissy when someone pulls them up over their content is not lost on people here, thankfully. I found this review quite worthless in many respects; there is very little content on the actual sound or composition of the album, with more attention paid to how YOU wanted it to sound. I also agree with the comment below last - right from the start, in your own words, you reviewed this album based on something it really isn't, which accounts for the childish tone in many parts.
Cantona's Avatar
Cantona | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I dislike this review, it belongs on pitchfork or something. I loved FAS, i like this new album. But DSO is a mood band, you have to be in the right frame of mind to their later material from start to finish. Generally when the "fuck this world, i want to destroy galaxies" mood takes you, DSO rules (as long as you already like the music anyway). I'll tell you what disturbs me more than this review, the fact that this site is quickly becoming like a political spin machine. Almost any review that is controversial (or just plain silly, like this one) is quickly backed up and supported by multiple other reviewers. Like they take criticism as one entity - you hurt one you hurt them all. I don't like it and it isn't natural in place like this. Literary skills does not make a review correct or even well thought out, just so you other reviewers know. It's fast becoming MR's own pretention problem....brilliant review old chap!!Spanking literary skeelz!! (yeah but it's still fucking wrong, because i know what i like and nobody can tell me otherwise, and i don't give a fuck if people try to dissect WHY i like it)
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
butthurt douchebag. if people are entitled to their opinion, it's just as valid to think this album sucks as to think it rules.
Cantona's Avatar
Cantona | posted on 11/2010
anonymous panty wearer, i didn't take issue with the reviewers opinion, i took issue with him giving me MY opinion. Obviously there's probably been 50 reviews done by Chris that i liked, but i didn't like this one. \m/
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
You're spot on, and it wouldn't surprise me if that 'anonymous' reply was another reviewer haha. Sad bastards.
Reverend Campbell's Avatar
Reverend Campbell  | posted on 11/2010
There's no grand agenda, and I apologize on behalf of my fellow staffers if it comes off that way. When you break it down, we're all readers of the site, just like you, and if it seems like we're quick to comment, well...it's because we're here almost daily. Personally, I like reading things that I both agree with and vehemently disagree with, and for that reason, I can read Charles Krauthammer without blowing a gasket; I can even appreciate his worldview, fucked as it may be. (And to the Anonymous poster below inferring that we'd post anonymous insults at our readers: That's pretty insulting, and I don't think we've ever given anyone a reason to believe that we'd do such a thing. We appreciate everyone that visits the site, and everyone that takes the time to comment on the reviews--even if the feedback is negative.)
SP420's Avatar
SP420 | posted on 12/2010
Don't apologize to this dicklick. Anyone who tries to connect a metal review site to a "political spin machine" just deserves to be laughed at. On the other hand, this site is wonderful! Some of the most talented metal reviewers on the internet!!!
SP420's Avatar
SP420 | posted on 12/2010
Forgot to add: this review is spot on in terms of my feelings about DsO. Everyone just thinks you're not "getting it" or have ass taste in black metal if your opinion of this band is sour. They are nothing special at all. When I listened to this album for the first time, I couldn't even tell when one song ended and another began. Just a massive indistinguishable blur.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 2/2011
"Everyone just thinks you're not "getting it" or have ass taste in black metal if your opinion of this band is sour. They are nothing special at all. When I listened to this album for the first time, I couldn't even tell when one song ended and another began. Just a massive indistinguishable blur." ^^^^ Eh? All you hear is a 'massive indistinguishable blur' while others hear a masterpiece and somehow you disagree with the statement that you're not getting the album? Obviously there is something you're not getting that the rest of us are. Or are you really as narcistic as to think that anyone that doesn't see it your way must be pretending to like it?
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I really, really, REALLY hate it when someone tells me I'm just pretending to like something. Had you left that little tidbit out, maybe I would've taken the review a little more seriously. Probably not though, especially when your biggest complaint seems to be their not generic enough. (No tremolo picking?!?! WAHHHH!)
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
Ugh, I used "their" instead" of "they're". Let's see if the internet community pays any attention to my post now.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
"Going into this review, I realized I could analyze the long-awaited conclusion to Deathspell Omega’s trilogy in two ways; as some mystical statement of philosophical intent miraculously bestowed on the metal world through metaphysical entities disguised as musicians, or as a metal album." Why couldn't you have reviewed this album as just a piece of music like, ye know, anyone half decent, half brained reviewer would do? The "TREMELO PICK something" comment was cringe worthy, too.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Come on!! Deathspell Omega rule!!! I loved this album
novairon's Avatar
novairon | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I may dig out DsO for a song or two here or there, but I don't think i've ever listened to a whole album, and doubt that's likely to change. Then again, i'm not exactly the biggest fan of black metal as a whole, so maybe I don't know what i'm talking about. But yes, I agree with this review based on what I heard. Listened to pieces of it and have no desire to go back and hear more.
tunedtothedevil's Avatar
tunedtothedevil | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
'fans had to pretend to like it' I though i used to love this band, but then i realised I havent listened to Fas in at least a year. I think this statement is pretty apt, for me at least. Either I was kidding myself all along, or at some point i just stopped caring about their brand of formless wank. I think I'll save my money.
Wanderer's Avatar
Wanderer | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Trezevant, it's absolutely pretentious to assume from one interview that a band is indeed pretentious, lol. But really I don't see how one interview can tell you that much about a band trying to avoid criticism. It's absolutely fucking silly to assume that a band wants to be anonymous to avoid criticism with all of the information we have about the band. Maybe they're just artists you know?
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Your analysis of DsO fans is not only ignorant but also completely thoughtless. I expected better from you. There is both form and function to Fas, there are moments when it loses its form, but there is definite structure. It took me a lot of listens to figure that out. Whether you like it or not isn’t the concern though; why insult fans of the bands work when they’ve obviously heard in the music something you haven’t? Do you really think Fas’ fan base has some kind of herd like mentality? If so, it isn’t very discerning of you. Compositionally good music is good music, regardless of philosophy or fan base. Also, “purposely bad” that’s just lol, how did you ever come up with that one? By wasting three paragraphs on things that don’t matter; i.e. toolish fans, real or imagined, and the bands aura of anonymity you’ve fallen into the same trap you’re trying(and failing) to preach against. Focusing on aspects that are not the music. As for the music I disagree with your analysis as well, but you’re completely entitled to your opinion on it. What makes this album lackluster to you makes it amazing to me. I love the irregular patterns and jazzy structures. I enjoy the melodies and love when they intersperse with the blasting Black metal aggression. I find this album is more in line with Kenose, strangely, as far as the melodic side of it goes. Makes me wonder why you don’t enjoy this. To me, the focus on triumphant melodies is a step forward for a band ever scaling the heights of experimentation. All in all I’m pretty disappointed in the review, it seems purely reactionary to the hype and popularity DsO have recently amassed and it’s not even well written, especially since I consider your reviews and the site as a whole to be full of quality analysis and penmanship.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I stopped reading your review at "Anyone who doesn’t completely have their head up their own ass knows there was about five to ten minutes of actual worthwhile music on that album" (re: Fas...) What an idiotic comment. Gotta agree with this. Fas is still in regular rotation for me. Maybe I'm not kvlt enough, but experimentation is the one thing that draws me to the black metal acts I do listen to. I mean the genre is what, 20 years old? Stagnation is boring, bring on the weird and original stuff thank you very much.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I stopped reading your review at "Anyone who doesn’t completely have their head up their own ass knows there was about five to ten minutes of actual worthwhile music on that album" (re: Fas...) What an idiotic comment.
tarblackvomit's Avatar
tarblackvomit | posted on 11/2010
That comment was me, not yet signed in.
lee's Avatar
lee | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I think the best review I have read all year on this site. Well done Chris, great read.
Sophus's Avatar
Sophus | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I've never understood when people say Deathspell Omega's fans are elitist. I mean, the band themselves are clearly pretentious as all fuck. But I've never heard of a person buying into it. Anyway, excellent review
konradkantor's Avatar
konradkantor  | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Tremendous review, Chris. Although I disagree with the score, this is a top-notch piece of literary excellence and I agree with every word of it. Brilliant analysis of the band thus far. Oh, and those of you looking to fill this void: Jumalhämärä - Resignaatio Yes. Jumalhämärä - Resignaatio That's right y'all.
hooter's Avatar
hooter | posted on 11/2010
Resignaatio should be an album of the year contender on any list out there
TheSlayerM's Avatar
TheSlayerM  | posted on 11/2010
Haha, Konrad I truly admire your relentlessness.
zach's Avatar
zach  | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I haven't given this one enough time yet. I've enjoyed it, but it remains to be seen how well it will hold up. Good write-up too Chris.
khlysty's Avatar
khlysty | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Totally disagree. Fact is, most people, reviewer included, forget where DsO come from and where they arrive with "Paracletus". So, now, they crib off from Pink Floyd's most strung-out moments; from Van der Graaf's most paranoid; from King Crimson's most abstract. SO FUCKING WHAT? Live with it. They don't want to blast everything out, or tremolo-pick everything out. So? What the hell's the problem? They still expand, they still experiment, they still progress. So, you don't like the path they've taken. Okay, but your review seems to center around your expectations and not around the actual music. Sorry, but I really don't wanna read a well-written piece about what "Paracletus" is NOT, but about what it actually is. So, you like "Kenose" better.The fact that EVERY-fucking-THING that DsO have created since "SMRC" is different from each other should've rang a bell for you. Sorry, I respect your point of view, but it's totally WRONG, "M-O-O-N", that spells wrong...
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I was thoroughly enjoying the album for several nights without knowing anything about the band. Not even that it was a black metal group. Glad I didn’t because otherwise I probably wouldn’t be listening to it in the first place. I mostly listen to classical these days, but found this album to be a blast. Just to give the author of the review some perspective…
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
you're right. it is not black metal. It's "black metal" for Converge fans. Another great band reduced to Pitchfork-core.
TheSlayerM's Avatar
TheSlayerM  | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
This is one angry review. Also, very disappointing...
captain's Avatar
captain  | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I'm holding out to see if the switch gets flipped, but my relatively early response is that Paracletus fails to cover much new ground beyond diluting the overly abstract Fas brew with some watered down melodic pinches. And while I don't think I could call anything this band does out-right boring, I'd say this record's formula closes the trilogy in a surprisingly "kindly" manner, by DsO standards. I can't believe I'm actually saying that, but there it is. And despite my bellyaching, I'm still looking forward to getting up to my elbows with these tunes to see if time lessens my grousing. DsO albums often take me a looong time to fully digest. Very well written review, Chris.
slaytanic1's Avatar
slaytanic1 | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
I enjoyed reading the review even if I didn`t agree with nary a word of it. Each to their own, I think this is an outstanding album personally.
trezevant's Avatar
trezevant  | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Yep--a well-written, well-thought-out review that I don't much agree with. The comments about this band's pretenses and their use of those pretenses as a ward against criticism are spot-on. Nicely done, Chris.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
Haha, one big boy's club. Grow a pair of balls, kid.
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
This is brilliant music. To enjoy it I think one needs to release both expectations and comparisons from one's mind, which perhaps the reviewer has not done.
Reverend Campbell's Avatar
Reverend Campbell  | posted on 11/2010
So, in order to enjoy something, you need to pretend that it exists in some intangible netherworld where nothing else of substance has yet been created?
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010
Not at all, but often if you have (overly) definite expectations, you end up critiquing an album for what it is not instead of appreciating an album for what it is.
anxiety hangover's Avatar
anxiety hangover | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
This is an interesting and well-written review. I haven't had time to fully digest the album, but I don't entirely agree. I think I'm one of the few DsO fans that don't keep hoping the band will write Si Monumentum Pt II, III, etc. And that being the case, for me this is easily one of the best black metal records I've heard this year, simply because like Fas, it goes so far in subverting the idea of "black metal" qua "black metal." And after the near-stagnation of the black metal scene for the last half-dozen years DsO's continuing differentness, even at the sake of possible greatness, is refreshing.
Jazrodian's Avatar
Jazrodian | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Spot on
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
i disagree
PolarBear's Avatar
PolarBear | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
Honestly, the only band I can think of that truelly sounds like hell. In a good way. I mean it's not like I want to go to hell but listening to their albums is like looking down a pit and being like "hey, cool, its hell! I feel dirty now!"
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
holy goat
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
a s t o n i s h i n g
Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 11/2010 | Reply
holy shit.