Album Review

Score 5.5
Written by Jordan Campbell
Published on 2/24/2009
Many years ago, I nervously stumbled through the doorway of Station 4 (then known as The Lab) with an absolutely brutal -brutal- fake ID embedded in my sweaty palm. It was a hell of a gamble: an undersized 17-year-old trying to worm his way into a 18-plus show with an out-of-state license rivalling the one Hawk was sporting in Detroit Rock City in terms of sheer ridiculousness. But I was convinced that I could slide into that Lowertown dive by sheer will. And I did.

Due to the passage of time (as well as severe brain cell trauma), the headliner's identity escapes recollection. But the opening act left an imprint. Show-stopping drumming, viciously precise rhythm riffing, and furious soloing formed a massive fist that nearly cleaned my skull from its stump. Post-set, I righted my equilibrium and sped over to the merch table, where I bought a hard copy of the CD that they repped so well only minutes previous - Determination - and a commemorative t-shirt. A thought buzzed..."These guys are going to be huge." Those guys were God Forbid.

God Forbid seems to have been thinking the same thing, but have taken a questionable path towards making it reality. While the band's work ethic is indisputable--few bands on the planet have toured as tirelessly as they--their creative decisions have left something to be desired. The followup to Determination, Gone Forever, streamlined their spastic thrashcore into an accessible stew of anthemry. By most counts, however, the album was a success, riding on the strength of wicked leads and expertly timed hooks. IV: The Constution of Treason headed futher down the path of commericial viability, but the brittle, toothless nature of the record allowed it to fold like cardboard as it collapsed under a weight of tryhard pretentiousness and lofty expectations. While they've grounded themselves to a degree, Earthsblood continues their shift away from immediacy and panache, and lazily leans on ineffective hooks and easily-digested formulas to do the majority of the legwork. Aiming to satiate plebian desires with palatable half-thrash, God Forbid has set the bar pretty low on Earthsblood. And they fail to clear it.

The glaring lack of heaviness that plagued IV still haunts the band. Abandoning the riffing and kinetics that they boasted when they burst onto the scene, God Forbid continue to bank their songs on centerpiece choruses. Which wouldn't be a bad thing -  if they were executed powerfully. But the band's insistence on making glorified backup vocals the crux of their attack basically kills any shot at crafting their personal "Wasted Years," or more comparitively, "Symphony of Destruction." The illustrious roster of heavy metal's iconic vocalists has been recounted numerous times, and it's safe to say that none of the members of God Forbid will be joining those ranks.

The decision to go in an arena rock-ish direction has proven to be a poor one, and not just because of the lackluster vocals. Often, the band's newfound simplicity comes across as plodding and hackneyed. "Walk Alone" takes on an 80's-esque vibe, but it's the same skank that Shadows Fall has been flirting with since The Art of Balance. "The New Clear" starts as an odd pseudo-ballad, then decends into a faceless mush of chugga-chugga thwomp before finding some light in the final minute. Even that flash of light, however, is dimmer than it should be - the interplay of the Coyle brothers is strangely anticlimactic and seems to fade into the background far too easily. Worse yet, "Empire of the Gun" and "Bat The Angels" are simply circle-pit fodder wrapped in a melodic thrash tortilla - lame-ass burritos that anyone with a Lamb of God album or a detuned Schecter sitting in the corner has already gorged themselves on.

The spitshined thrashpop throng is already crowded and growing ultra-stale, especially with Machine Head trying to strongarm their way into the picture again. There's little room outside of that sandbox for this thing to grow. Nothing on Earthsblood is as important or transcendant as it attempts to be, and the flat and clinical presentation doesn't help its case. It's a sad truth, but God Forbid forgot their teeth again. But that's okay - surely, there are still some teething young metalheads out there that will slobber all over this thing. It's just unfortunate that after nearly a decade, God Forbid are still playing with the kids.



kevin macken's Avatar
kevin macken | posted on 7/2010 | Reply
This review is absolutely spot on. Really well done.
jamesrpage's Avatar
jamesrpage | posted on 6/2009 | Reply
hahaha... this is horsesh!t
rattleyourgodamnhead's Avatar
rattleyourgodamnhead | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
This is garbage
ValhallAw8s's Avatar
ValhallAw8s | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
this album was so bad that it made me sell off my entire god forbid discography... with the exception of determination (the obvious high note of their career).
thibodeau13's Avatar
thibodeau13 | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
i never agree with any of his reviews, constitution of treason just built on gone forever and made them better
Steve P's Avatar
Steve P | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
Finally got around listening to their myspace tracks. I'll disagree with anyone saying this pop metal but I think you'd be retarded to say they are not trying to gain mainstream success as soon as those clean vocals kick in. They seem so out of place. At least on the last album they seem to fit now they are pointless. I can't comment on the whole album but some good/great riffs can't hide poor songwriting. I'm sure MetalSucks will love it though!
Iron Maiden's Avatar
Iron Maiden | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
Rock is right. Nothing modern rock about any of this.
Wharwulf's Avatar
Wharwulf | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
As strong as this album starts off, it pretty much limps toward its end.
evilsonic's Avatar
evilsonic | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
The only cool thing about this album is the second disc 'live at the starland ballroom'. I don't say the're bad but Earthsblood's just boring to me. In my eyes Constitution was better.
fightingmike's Avatar
fightingmike | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
I agree with this review for the most part. I only like a few of the songs on here and the only song i really love is Bat the Angels because of it's Pantera-esque Main riff and sludged out outro. The upbeat 80's-ish songs and melodic vocals do nothing for me on here and the main screamed vocals sound more generic than they ever have on any of their past records. Bummer, i thought this might be awesome.
m4gg0t5's Avatar
m4gg0t5 | posted on 3/2009 | Reply
I've never disagree more on a review than this one. This band have his own style since the beginning and he's doing it pretty well. For me, Constitution was a big let down but I liked it. Earthsblood is quite different then what they used to do but it's pretty heavy and people are still complaining. I just don't get it. It heavy, their sound is quite unique, they do it and do it well. Really I get really sick about the review everytime a band as little success. I've liked it the very first time and I like it more and more each time I play it. It's a buy for sure and I'm going to the store this tuesday. Sorry Jordan but your 3 in songwriting is outrageous. It's a 4.5/5 easily. My score until today is 5/5/4.5
Lost_Souls's Avatar
Lost_Souls | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
spitshined thrashpop = my new term. Thanks.
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I kind of agree with Razorhog. It's not perfect... God Forbid, ever since Gone Forever, has had one main problem: Focus. Their shit tends to be all over the place, and they have a real problem making tight threads. Well, that and someone needs to either get Dallas some singing lessons or remove him from the mic and let Byron take full duties.
Razorhog's Avatar
Razorhog | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
The more I listen to this, the more I disagree with this review. This is much better than their last effort.
Red's Avatar
Red | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
@ tunedtothedevil : sorry, I didn't mean for the few years to be taken so literally. I guess I should have stated "more than a few years". @Anxiety Hangover: Ya know, I get what you mean. It's just that from my personal experiance commercial rock/aggro radio stations unfortunately cater more to the likes of bands such as Disturbed or Hinder or whatever the hell is the rock flavor of the week.
Anxiety Hangover's Avatar
Anxiety Hangover | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
@Rock I guess we just disagree. After a while, stuff like this all sounds the same to me. If it's not meant to vie for radio airplay, it's definitely meant to appeal to a different kind of metal fan than myself.
number9's Avatar
number9 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
sorry I took a five hour energy earlier and forgot how to put sentences together and spell. my bad MR
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
The first half isn't as good as the first half?
number9's Avatar
number9 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I thought the album before this was horrible. This album is alot better. I think Dallas should just stick to guitar. They are never going to catch lightning in a bottle like the determination album. My biggest pet peave is that the first half of this album was not as good as the first half. I feel the 2nd half is way better then the first.
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
@ Anxiety Hangover: If God Forbid is your definition of easily-digestible metal, then you need to lay off the Psycroptic (or Psyopus for that matter) and listen to some... you know... actual really digestible metal. And yeah, congrats, you've listened to about as much metal as anyone here. Probably less, judging by some of the people here. That is neither a qualification nor a barometer of your "metalness". What separates GF from all those other bands? They may not be as heavy as someone like Bolt Thrower, but their sound is not as smooth-edged like newer In Flames. Lamb of God and Pantera throw out riffs for the pits, and regardless of how heavy they may be they're generally easy on the ears and go for the cheap seats. Same with Shadows Fall. God Forbid has melody and isn't very heavy, but it's NOT in a method suitable for radio. Their singing alone won't get them airplay, as their vocals have neither the easy browl-gwa-gwa of Pantera and LOG, the similarity to Korn's singing that In Flames gets away with, nor the soaring croon of Shadows Fall. When I hear this album, I hear something inbetween Unearth, 86-88 Metallica, "Countdown" era Megadeth, and even a little modern Meshuggah, and someone forgot to put the lead vocal line in and just left the backups. There is nothing in this bitches brew that says "RADIO AIRPLAY" at all.
tunedtothedevil's Avatar
tunedtothedevil | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
red ... just out of interest, if you've only worked at the radio station for a few years, how come you've hosted the metal show for a decade??
Reason's Voice's Avatar
Reason's Voice | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Checkin this out. Can't help but think that they were trying to achieve a much grander sound and feeling than they actually managed, but I don't dis-like it. It's just not doing much for me (this style usually doesn't), but there is definitely some sweet riffage to be found here n there. Not too big on it, but it wouldn't anger me if their popularity snowballs because of it. And if this is mainstream radio hard rock, that genre is surely improved by it.
Anxiety Hangover's Avatar
Anxiety Hangover | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I've been listening to metal for longer than many of the posters on here have been alive. In that time, I have listened to almost every variety/subgenre of metal, from the mainstream to the obscure, from those labeled great to those labeled terrible, so I know metal when I hear it. GF is writing hard rock-tinged, easily digestible metal in the same way as those bands I previously listed, much the same way Lamb of God has done and In Flames has done. Throw on some masks and you've got a slightly thrashier Slipknot. A rose by any other name... And tell me Red, if LoG, Pantera, In Flames, Mastodon, Shadows Fall are played on hard rock radio, why not GF? What separates the them from the aforementioned hard rock radio staples? It sure as hell isn't heaviness or inaccessibility.
Red's Avatar
Red | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
the lashes on this one are all over the place, but I personally feel that if you liked any of their previous material then you will like this one as well. As far as sounding hard rock (or like bands on rock radio), well that's total bullshit. I have worked at a rock station for a few years now, and I have been the director and host of our extreme metal program for 10 years now and GF does not fit into the rock/hard rock category for airplay. That is not an opinion, that is a format/demographic fact.
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I've been known to post up some pretty unpopular bands in my time, but if you seriously think Lacuna Coil, Megadeth, or newer Metallica sound like God Forbid (and, consequently, like each other at the fuck all) you need to get your head checked. This isn't even in defense of GF, this is in defense of common sense. I thought this place had shedded the elitist-for-the-fuck-of-it crowd a while back.
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
A lot, lot, lot fucking different.
Anxiety Hangover's Avatar
Anxiety Hangover | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I didn't call them "modern rock." I said they aren't much different than the bands played on HARD ROCK radio. How different is God Forbid from In Flames, Lacuna Coil, Megadeth, (newer) Metallica, or a host of others?
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Okay, I understand God Forbid isn't the most underground or nasty or heavy band in the world... ...but calling them modern rock shows a complete disconnect with reality.
MetalFusion's Avatar
MetalFusion | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Yeah, this band is so "commercial" their music is on constant rotation on mainstream rock radio with the likes of platinum selling acts Fall Out Boy and My Chemical Romance...
number9's Avatar
number9 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Tonight I am going to try my best to give an unbiased opinion on this album. There last one was very commercial so it will tarnish this experience.
Anxiety Hangover's Avatar
Anxiety Hangover | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I too saw God Forbid a number of years ago in the Twin Cities, although I saw 'em at First Ave. There were sorta okay then, but in the years since they have done nothing but gotten progressively worse. Their newest album isn't much different than the shit that gets played on hard rock radio (that is NOT a compliment); half of this sounds like Korn trying to play thrash riffs. I think the Rev was overly kind in his scores.
tanknitrous's Avatar
tanknitrous | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I see folks are all over the map on this one. I understand how God Forbid NOW can be a take it or leave it propostion. I, for one, will definitely take it. I love this album. I think it shits all over "constitution of treason". A big step up.
rock's Avatar
rock | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Pretty good album. Still can't take too much of Dallas singing, but it doesn't tarnish it beyond belief.
tunedtothedevil's Avatar
tunedtothedevil | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
nice review ... ignore the dribbling GF fanboys.
trezevant's Avatar
trezevant  | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
This band used to be pretty cool. Le sigh.
BEZOAR's Avatar
BEZOAR | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Steamin' friggin' turd this one. For all of his mouth-flapping, you'd think Dallas could write a decent song. Not so, these cats are over.
Deke''s Avatar
Deke' | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
This may be a first, but I'm going to have to respectfully and totally disagree with Mr.Campbell on this one. It's a cool fucking album with a bunch of jammin' riffs, and isn't difficult to just throw on and rock out. Maybe it's just me, but this album is exactly what I want out of a band that doesn't try to rip you to pieces or pound you into the ground at every turn. It's just good metal that they put a lot of effort into, and I'm cool with it. 5.5/5/5.5, I'd be happy to own it.
slaytanic1's Avatar
slaytanic1 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Yeah, Blabbermouth gave it 9.5/10 I believe. I`m sure the fact GF are on Roadrunner has nothing to do with this at all of course.
MINDSI1618's Avatar
MINDSI1618 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
jordan cambelll- you suck. this is the most unfair review this site ever issued. this owns and you should be fired. fuck you and your (lack of) taste in music. album of the year and gf's most creative effort. 6/6/6
MetalFusion's Avatar
MetalFusion | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I personally love this album. The Blabbermouth review is glowing in its praise for this disc.
Emoholocaust287's Avatar
Emoholocaust287 | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Fuck this review this album owns. Much better than boring new Cannibal Corpse
evilsonic's Avatar
evilsonic | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
Disappointing
Radar's Avatar
Radar | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
DDDEEEEERRRRRRPPPPP!
The Metal Mallet's Avatar
The Metal Mallet | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I couldn't even get through the free preview the band gave this album. You're completely right about how they use backup vocals as lead vocals. Just doesn't sound right.
Razorhog's Avatar
Razorhog | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
This is the first God Forbid album I've enjoyed enough to buy. 5/4.5/4.5
Matt's Avatar
Matt  | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
"Worse yet, "Empire of the Gun" and "Bat The Angels" are simply circle-pit fodder wrapped in a melodic thrash tortilla - lame-ass burritos that anyone with a Lamb of God album or a detuned Schecter sitting in the corner has already gorged themselves on." Great line.......!
elpants's Avatar
elpants | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
At least this is a fair review, only a matter of time before Metalsucks gives it "album of the year" status.
elpants's Avatar
elpants | posted on 2/2009 | Reply
I came, I listened, I vowed to not bother pirating.