Album Review

Score 7.1
Written by Ian Duncan-Brown
Published on 7/31/2006
The only thing I knew about 5ive before I listened to this EP was that they share their name with a late 90's British boy band. I didn’t really know what style to expect from them, but once I realized that this recording consists of two proper tracks and two Justin Broadrick remixes, I began to suspect that 5ive were worth hearing. To summarize this review, 5ive sound roughly like a combination of Pelican and Broadrick’s current group, Jesu. They also happen to be yet another instrumental group, the second I’ve done a writeup for in as many days. Although it’s hard to get a sense of the band from such a short recording, especially since instrumental albums tend to run long, this certainly strikes me as something worth looking into.

I found the material on this release to be melodious and relaxing, which is my general reaction to instrumental music, even instrumental music with distorted, low tuned guitars, such as this. The playing is tight and the songs are well put together, in any event. My only complaint is that I don’t find much that distinguishes this from the rest of the Neurosis-core Hydrahead-based scene that’s been all the rage lately. I enjoy this album a lot, but I’d be more impressed with it if I heard it in a void, as I’ve already heard the style done better. I wouldn’t be surprised if 5ive have been going for longer than some of the other bands who play the style, and in that case, I retract my criticism. However, as is, the music struck me as somewhat derivative.

5ive’s latest EP is definitely a good quality listen and well worth looking into for fans of the whole Hyrahead sludge/doom/prog sound. However, I wouldn’t recommend them over the better known artists who play the style.



kenny's Avatar
kenny | posted on 8/2006 | Reply
i really wish that reviewers would stop listing pelican as a reference in their reviews for an instrumental band. especially in this forum. pelican is listed ad nauseum and its really poor on the reviewers part, there is so much more to focus on.
Unknown Metalhead
someone | posted on 8/2006 | Reply
@ ian: I disagree. If something is derivative of everything else out there it is derivative whether or not the band is new or old. Just listen to the music with no names attached and then tell me how good it is. That's what makes an album listenable, the music, not the name behind it.
Unknown Metalhead
Ian | posted on 8/2006 | Reply
re. Someone... the answer to your question is yes. sometimes it's important to consider the context of a release.
Unknown Metalhead
Curious | posted on 8/2006 | Reply
What's wrong with Sunn's live show, exactly?
Unknown Metalhead
someone | posted on 8/2006 | Reply
So when something sounds the same and it's from a new band it's derivative and should be avoided, but when it's from an old band it's okay because they helped pioneer it and should be heard?
brandonmetal's Avatar
brandonmetal | posted on 7/2006 | Reply
I LOVED 5IVE shows when they used to play- haven't heard this one, but the telestic disfracture is EXCELLENT [it includes vocals by ex-milligram, only living witness singer], and the 'single' [20 minutes or so instrumental] that followed was decent [though with some godawful remix as a 2nd track] on the whole, i peg them ABOVE pelican, and don't even consider sunn worthy of mentioning anymore [the live performance is nauseating, almost as awful as khanate...] i said it first: it's only a matter of time before doom becomes trendy... ahhh!!!!!