Album Review

Score 6.1
Written by Doug Moore
Published on 5/17/2006
So it turns out that some of these dudes were in Yaphet Kotto, which will mean something to approximately eight of this site’s readers, but they wouldn’t have been able to tell by listening anyway. Saviours are doing the cool new “we’re not metalheads but we’ll try our hands at metal anyway” thing, a la The Sword or Three Inches of Blood or what have you. Fortunately, Crucifire isn’t a deliberate genre study or tongue-in-cheek smirk-metal (god, that shit’s getting stale). These Californians are attempting a fairly catholic blend of old-school-oriented styles here, with melodic thrash, Venom-esque proto black metal, rumbling fuzz rock, and even a bit of NWOBHM showing up here. The results ain’t nothing to write home about, but Saviours do summon up some memorable tunes, and a surprisingly serious metallic punch.

So they’re not doing anything new, but as always with this sort of deliberate-throwback shit, they wouldn’t want to. Crucifire goes to pains to be a no-frills metal album; every song is about Satan or pagan rituals or whatever, the songs are more or less dynamic-free, and the whole affair is brief and to the point. The chugging mid-tempo thrash riffs come early and often throughout songs like “Holy Slaughter” and “Exalter of Thorns,” but most of the songs at least dip into a fairly deep and well-researched well of twin leads and single-string riffs. The soloing is straightforward late seventies/early eighties showmanship, blending Iommian bends with Smith/Murray speed licks. The only real sticking point is the vocals. While I’m usually not a fan of flamboyant, dramatic singing, Saviours actually could’ve done with a little extra pomp in their vox, which are delivered in a bland distorted yell throughout the album.

This shit is all getting a little dull by the time terse charger “Christ Hunt” rolls around, but afterwards Crucifire actually takes a turn for the better. The album’s final three tracks have much more of a High On Fire-esque stoner heft than their predecessors, and a smidge of blues rock creeps into “Heathen Eye.” These last three cuts are easily the most memorable on the album, but slogging through the rest of it isn’t quite worth it.

So in the end there isn’t much to be said about Saviours. They do what they do reasonably well, especially considering their lack of extensive metal background, but the whole affair comes off as a little colorless. You’ve heard these riffs, these solos, and these structures before, oftentimes from bands who’ve been around for decades. Whether you need more of them is up to you, but personally, I’m just about done with the recidivism.



Anonymous's Avatar
Anonymous | posted on 12/2010 | Reply
pick a guitar and do it your self fat ass
Unknown Metalhead
Frank | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
3IOB are definately metalheads. Ever heard of Goatsblood? Anyway, I love The Sword and like Early Man, and I think this album is pretty good, too. You don't get the sound that The Sword is putting out without listening to a lot of doom metal. It seems like today, you have to be incredibly ugly or hairy to be able to play some types of metal without getting bashed. Metal itself is incredibly ironic, these bands actually realize it.
Unknown Metalhead
DoomSword | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
Doug, insincere or not, they're not gonna make a killing off playing metal, so I doubt they'd bother if they disliked the genre...
Unknown Metalhead
Oma | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
yaphet kotto are amazing. this is not
Unknown Metalhead
Doug w/MR | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
There's a distinction between not taking oneself too seriously and being insincere. As an aside, Tool takes themselves way too fucking seriously, Stinkfist or no.
Unknown Metalhead
Dill The Devil | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
DoomSword speaks sense. I mean, for fuck's sake, Tool are a pretty revered band in metal circles, and for every two-part concept track about Maynard's mom's stroke-induced paralysis, there are things like fake tracklists being supplied to magazines including songtitles like 'Poopy The Clown', the track 'Die Eir Von Satan' (sp?), and the lyrics to 'Stinkfist'. If they're not taking it seriously all the time, why should anyone else?
Unknown Metalhead
DoomSword | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
the thing is... if you like the music, what does it matter if the guy making it is being serious or not. A ton of bands now considered great started as a joke or just for kicks and groupies... One of my favorite bands are Manowar, 25 years of career and still it's debatable whether they're serious with that attitude or just fucking with us... the thing is whatever was their intent to begin with, it is an undeniable fact that they have produced some of the absolute fucking best metal out there, especially their first four albums, which are priceless metal classics. So don't dwell too much on the intentions of the musician rather than the actual finished product. Anyone who listens to the 3IOB album and finds it 'not metal enough' then I'm sorry but he's deaf. I don't know or care if they were hardcore kids but they've seen the light and their music has nothing to do with hardcore, unless Judas Priest, Iron Maiden, Manowar, Accept, Vicious Rumours etc.. are considered hardcore now...
Unknown Metalhead
Dill The Devil | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
Doug - can't disagree with you there at all. Perhaps my idea of a 'joke' band is different to everyone else's. I don't consider 3 Inches Of Blood a joke band, mainly 'cos I met the guitarist, Justin, before a gig in Wolverhampton last year and spent the night getting pissed and chatting metal with the guy, so I'm pretty sure that despite their short hair, they actually really are metal fans rather than hardcore kids doing it ironically. I didn't hear a hint of irony in Early Man's album, either - just an old-school metal outing. To me, 'joke' bands include stuff like Crotchduster (who I love) and Totally Fucking Gay (who I really don't).
Unknown Metalhead
Dill The Devil | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
a) I never said I expected people to be like me - the entire post was stating my opinion and nothing more. b) I don't consider 'joke bands' to be any better or worse than the 'real thing' - I just go with whether I enjoy the music or not. Don't get me wrong, I'm more likely to be found listening to Opeth, Agalloch, Dew-Scented or whatever more than EM or 3IoB - but I don't take the po-faced 'Metal is life' approach and discount bands whose output I may enjoy just because they might poke light-hearted fun at what is a scene ripe undeniably ripe for parody. c) AS have blatantly said in interviews that they only formed a band to get groupies.
Unknown Metalhead
Doug w/MR | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
I like to think I'm as passionate about metal as anyone, but you're right, metal's largely a pretty brainless genre. Part of what makes that stupidity tolerable, though, is conviction and intensity on the part of the musicians. That's why metal joke bands are almost never funny.
Lee's Avatar
Lee | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
Yeah well, fuck you, some of us take Metal serious and not as a joke. Even if don't agree with a lot of people on here, I know they love it with a passion like I do. You like fucking joke bands go and poking fun at the scene, that is cool, just don't expect everyone to be the same as you. I don't like to see farciscal joke bands lauded as the real thing and told they are better then the real thing. Actually is funny because I can take Avenged Sevenfold a hell of a lot more serious then I can 3 inches of cock. I thinks AS really does it cos the dig it. I think 3 inches failed at whatever they were doing, stole some riffs and got popular. Anyways, my opinion. I have only heard a few songs of each and don't plan on listining to anymore.
Unknown Metalhead
DoomSword | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
don't know about these guys or Early Man, but 3 Inches Of Blood are fucking brilliant! I don't give a fuck if they do it as a joke or they're just having fun like Dream Evil, but they sure write great, entertaining music... with killer vocals and shredding guitars... hey, that's metal in my books! Destroy the Ooooorcs!! :P
Unknown Metalhead
Dill The Devil | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
So, am I the only one who actually likes 3IoB and Early Man? I mean, I'm with Teufel from Teufel's Tomb as far as metal is concerned - however much I may love it, it's largely stupid music, and taking it (and ourselves) too seriously is even more stupid. "people who make it their lives" as Chris put it have to expect to be poked fun at from time to time if they make sweaty guys growling about rape and murder the central focus of their existence... and this is coming from a guy who has a metal solo project, spent the last two nights writing 21 reviews of metal albums, and is currently reading Metal Review while listening to Funeris Nocturnum at work.
Unknown Metalhead
Doug w/MR | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
This shit isn't quite as farcical as 3 Inches of Blood or even Early Man. It's not a bad album, it just isn't spectacular and doesn't feel especially sincere.
Lee's Avatar
Lee | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
and BTW Homicide: Life on the Street starrig Yapheet Kotto is on of the best TV shows of all time
Lee's Avatar
Lee | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
Fuck these faggot bands and the people that buy their shit. 3 inches of cock in their ass started all this crap, then Avenged Sevenfold (who DO NOT play Power Metal). I am not as nice as CC. Anyways, shit instead of buying this bullshit just get some of the real, original think like WASP or LA Guns or some shit like that.
Unknown Metalhead
Chris w/MetalReview | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
This intentional throwback metal from people who wouldn't be caught dead identifying themselves as metalheads and won't be listening to metal a few years into the future is an insult to people who make it their lives and proudly identify as metalheads. If these bands we're like, "We've been listening to Venom, Maiden, Priest, Sabbath, and Motorhead since we were little and this is our chance to explore those influences," I might be a little less hesitant to call them out, but the "ironic metal" approach where they treat metal like something worthy only of parody is insulting. I don't know this group, so I can't comment specifically on Saviours, but Early Man and The Sword definitely seem cut from that build. Hell, The Sword's FIRST show ever was performed at South by Southwest or whatever that trend-fest is called.
Devin's Avatar
Devin | posted on 5/2006 | Reply
Great review - it definitely summed up my feelings on this new trend of old styles that's been everywhere lately. Most of these bands are hit-or-miss for me, but it's getting to the point that I'm not even really interested in actively checking them out anymore. I'd probably go see them if they ever came through town. Who knows? I might buy a CD at the show if they're good live. Otherwise, though, I probably won't be looking for this album.